home team in CAPS
STEELERS -5.5 over Titans (L)
FALCONS -4.5 over Dolphins (W)
BENGALS -3.5 over Broncos (L)
VIKINGS -3.5 over Browns (this line is way too low) (W)
Jaguars +6.5 over COLTS (W)
SAINTS -11.5 over Lions (W)
Cowboys -3.5 over BUCCANEERS (W)
Eagles +0.5 over PANTHERS (odd line, trap game) (W)
RAVENS -8.5 over Chiefs (W)
Jets +4.5 over TEXANS (Texans have to give 4.5? really?) (W)
Redskins +6.5 over GIANTS (W)
CARDINALS -6.5 over 49ers (L)
SEAHAWKS -7.5 over Rams (W)
PACKERS -3.5 over Bears (W)
PATRIOTS -10.5 over Bills (L)
Chargers -6.5 over RAIDERS (Chargers own the Raiders)(L)
This Week: 11-5-0
Overall: 11-5-0
Thursday, September 10, 2009
NFL Week 1 Predictions
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Sometimes The Truth Is Worse
After reading Max Baucus's absurd health care proposal earlier today, something about it stuck in my brain and bothered me for the rest of the day. I couldn't figure out what exactly but it wouldn't go away.
Later tonight, when I was reading the transcript of the Obama speech, going over the same lines, same spin, same lies, one lie stood out above the rest; the one where Obama promises not to add to the deficit with a new healthplan.
This lie stood out because it is such a mathematical impossibility that it's hard to believe Obama keeps using it in high profile speeches.
Then I got to thinking that maybe Obama means it and if so, that is far worse indeed.
I get the feeling that he may think he can pay for it because after hearing his speech and seeing what Baucus put in his report on how to raise funds for the plan it is becoming increasingly clear that the massive changes in healthcare will be secondary to the primary objective which is the complete and total obliteration of the American tax code.
All of the proposed schemes that have been proposed by the administration in the Baucus plan are eliminations of tax benefits and reinstatement of the 36 & 39 percent tax brackets. It seems as if every pro-growth, pro-job, pro-consumer tax break that has been passed since Kennedy is on the block. Our progressive tax code will become a purely punitive/redistributive one. Combine that with the massive cuts to Medicare/Medicaid and focus on green jobs, which Spain figured out results in an overall job reduction, and the resulting situation is a scary mix of massive job loss, inflation and a decline in services for the poor and elderly. This will cause a greater dependence on government welfare programs completing the circle that liberals have worked so long and hard to implement.
With all of these massive cuts and tax increases, Obama may actually be able to claim a trillion dollars in savings to even out the books for healthcare. Not that it matters, every dollar the government collects it spends immediately. That's why all our major welfare programs are completely bankrupt.
This isn't really too surprising I guess. All liberal programs and policies are just various end arounds to get a hold of taxpayer money, this might just be the most elaborate, expansive money grab yet.
Later tonight, when I was reading the transcript of the Obama speech, going over the same lines, same spin, same lies, one lie stood out above the rest; the one where Obama promises not to add to the deficit with a new healthplan.
This lie stood out because it is such a mathematical impossibility that it's hard to believe Obama keeps using it in high profile speeches.
Then I got to thinking that maybe Obama means it and if so, that is far worse indeed.
I get the feeling that he may think he can pay for it because after hearing his speech and seeing what Baucus put in his report on how to raise funds for the plan it is becoming increasingly clear that the massive changes in healthcare will be secondary to the primary objective which is the complete and total obliteration of the American tax code.
All of the proposed schemes that have been proposed by the administration in the Baucus plan are eliminations of tax benefits and reinstatement of the 36 & 39 percent tax brackets. It seems as if every pro-growth, pro-job, pro-consumer tax break that has been passed since Kennedy is on the block. Our progressive tax code will become a purely punitive/redistributive one. Combine that with the massive cuts to Medicare/Medicaid and focus on green jobs, which Spain figured out results in an overall job reduction, and the resulting situation is a scary mix of massive job loss, inflation and a decline in services for the poor and elderly. This will cause a greater dependence on government welfare programs completing the circle that liberals have worked so long and hard to implement.
With all of these massive cuts and tax increases, Obama may actually be able to claim a trillion dollars in savings to even out the books for healthcare. Not that it matters, every dollar the government collects it spends immediately. That's why all our major welfare programs are completely bankrupt.
This isn't really too surprising I guess. All liberal programs and policies are just various end arounds to get a hold of taxpayer money, this might just be the most elaborate, expansive money grab yet.
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
My Daily Reminder - *Unpleasant Photos*
Somehow, I've managed to carve out a life that includes many a long trip up and down the dusty stretch of Interstate 25 connecting Pueblo and Colorado Springs. The trip south is as delightful as ever but my northern journey home has been compromised.
About 16 miles into my trip, right about when I start my less than safe habit of eating lunch on the highway, I am accosted with the following message:
"You probably never thought about tearing off your own skin, meth will change all of that.", or something close to that.
Awesome!
What could be better? Oh yes, the picture that goes with the message. It appears to be a tub drain, maybe a sink. Either way the drain is surrounded by huge bloody chunks of what I assume is skin and a blood covered razor blade.
Nice! How is that ham sandwich and pomegranate Arizona tea going down? Not great but thanks for asking.
Aside from ruining my lunch, this annoys me on several fronts.
First, how is this not an obscenity? God forbid Coors, Jim Beam, Marlboro or Playboy have a billboard showing a little boozing, smoking or something sexually suggestive. Hell no! Then the morality police start screaming about the children and the degradation of society. Mothers fainting in the streets all over the place, fathers crying about the future with little to no dignity on display. Gimmie a break.
I have daughters and I can easily explain the sight of alcohol, smokes and scantily clad human beings. No problem. How much fun do you think it is explaining away a tub full of blood filled with razor blades? Thanks for keeping Joe Camel away though, that saved me a whole two minutes of easy parenting you hypocritical, condescending jackasses. Why don't you get back to banning dodgeball and not keeping score at baseball games.
Secondly, how is that War on Drugs going? Not good if this is what we're getting down to.
The most infuriating part of this is that I would bet every red nickle I have that we are still spending twenty times more money trying to stop marijuana use than meth. I'm sure this billboard took up no less than than 20% of the Stop Meth budget.
Rather than just being critical, I do have a couple of suggestions. First, how about a little prioritizing? Spend all your money on meth, then when you get that under control move on to heroin, the coke, then crack, then pot, red bull, aspirin, whippets, whatever. Secondly, if you are determined to use this billboard, why not put it in the city where, you know, human beings actually are? This particular billboard is right smack in the middle of nowhere between the other billboards for the local CBS affiliate and The North Pole featuring Santa's Workshop (a local amusement park for those of you non-locals). I'm sure those two groups love the connection.
Look, I hate meth and its user as much as anybody. It/they are more destructive than any other set of drug users. But really, it's bad enough that I can't get a quality cold medicine without 2 forms of ID and a DNA sample because of these societal cancers but now all of us normal folk have to be subjected to this ineffective, borderline obscene billboard and pay for it with our own tax dollars? Shame the devil!
. . . . .
Good news kiddies! I found some pics of this phenomenon to share, imagine these on huge billboards and enjoy at your own peril!
(this is the one we have in Colorado. I guess they have more in Montana.)

(awesome. . . )

(better . . . )

(disco!)

If I don't post for a while it's because I'm busy planting GPS devices in both my daughters skulls. These things take time but pay for themselves in the long run.
About 16 miles into my trip, right about when I start my less than safe habit of eating lunch on the highway, I am accosted with the following message:
"You probably never thought about tearing off your own skin, meth will change all of that.", or something close to that.
Awesome!
What could be better? Oh yes, the picture that goes with the message. It appears to be a tub drain, maybe a sink. Either way the drain is surrounded by huge bloody chunks of what I assume is skin and a blood covered razor blade.
Nice! How is that ham sandwich and pomegranate Arizona tea going down? Not great but thanks for asking.
Aside from ruining my lunch, this annoys me on several fronts.
First, how is this not an obscenity? God forbid Coors, Jim Beam, Marlboro or Playboy have a billboard showing a little boozing, smoking or something sexually suggestive. Hell no! Then the morality police start screaming about the children and the degradation of society. Mothers fainting in the streets all over the place, fathers crying about the future with little to no dignity on display. Gimmie a break.
I have daughters and I can easily explain the sight of alcohol, smokes and scantily clad human beings. No problem. How much fun do you think it is explaining away a tub full of blood filled with razor blades? Thanks for keeping Joe Camel away though, that saved me a whole two minutes of easy parenting you hypocritical, condescending jackasses. Why don't you get back to banning dodgeball and not keeping score at baseball games.
Secondly, how is that War on Drugs going? Not good if this is what we're getting down to.
The most infuriating part of this is that I would bet every red nickle I have that we are still spending twenty times more money trying to stop marijuana use than meth. I'm sure this billboard took up no less than than 20% of the Stop Meth budget.
Rather than just being critical, I do have a couple of suggestions. First, how about a little prioritizing? Spend all your money on meth, then when you get that under control move on to heroin, the coke, then crack, then pot, red bull, aspirin, whippets, whatever. Secondly, if you are determined to use this billboard, why not put it in the city where, you know, human beings actually are? This particular billboard is right smack in the middle of nowhere between the other billboards for the local CBS affiliate and The North Pole featuring Santa's Workshop (a local amusement park for those of you non-locals). I'm sure those two groups love the connection.
Look, I hate meth and its user as much as anybody. It/they are more destructive than any other set of drug users. But really, it's bad enough that I can't get a quality cold medicine without 2 forms of ID and a DNA sample because of these societal cancers but now all of us normal folk have to be subjected to this ineffective, borderline obscene billboard and pay for it with our own tax dollars? Shame the devil!
. . . . .
Good news kiddies! I found some pics of this phenomenon to share, imagine these on huge billboards and enjoy at your own peril!
(this is the one we have in Colorado. I guess they have more in Montana.)

(awesome. . . )

(better . . . )

(disco!)

If I don't post for a while it's because I'm busy planting GPS devices in both my daughters skulls. These things take time but pay for themselves in the long run.
Sunday, September 6, 2009
Pillars of American Leftists
During the short tenure of this new President I have come to one conclusion that shocks even me.
I am starting to really like full blown, out in the open Communists.
This sounds strange but Marx's army are far less frustrating then your average liberal Statist. At least the Commie has an well thought out manifesto and plan of action, wrong as it is. You can debate and argue with these people because you can argue idea for idea, point by point with some hope of resolution.
Liberals in the United States have no such coherent system of beliefs. They are all over the board, contradicting themselves whenever the need arises. Can their ideology even be measured or classified? We're going to try!
Pillar One: Identity. Identity plays more a role in liberal politics than anything else. Rather than seeing the United States as a county, they see a collection of people defined into various groups of victims and victimizers. They see themselves as champions of the victims. The liberal also believes that people that fall into the victim class cannot help themselves in life. This belief is used to justify the ever intrusive actions of the government and by extension themselves.
SUB Pillar A: Circular Bigotry. Leftists have carved out an amazing niche of racism against everybody. White people (except for enlightened liberals) are by their very nature afraid of and biased against all people of color. All decisions by non liberal whites are viewed from this paradigm and are therefore subject to suspicious interpretation. Minorities are also viewed through the lens of racism. They are seen by the liberal eye as being incapable of fending for themselves in this world. They can only survive with the help of the government when run by enlightened, white liberals. It is a condescending form of racism, viewing entire groups of people as incompetent and helpless. Whenever a minority rises to prominence without liberal help, they are savagely attacked as being Uncle Toms or sellouts of some kind. See Thomas, Clarence. Sowell, Thomas or Estrada, Miguel.
Pillar Two: Class. American leftists have a deep rooted seething hatred of rich people. This is a flagrant contradiction since the liberal ranks hold some of the worlds wealthiest people, a fact often forgot by leftists when raging against big business. This hypocritical belief allows liberal to simultaneously reap the rewards of rich donors while also allowing them to stoke class warfare against other rich people. This is done to solidify a power base. Liberals benefit from class warfare by convincing the larger group of people (not rich) that they are the helpless victims of the smaller group (rich) and that government is the force to relieve them from their imaginary oppression. The American Dream of hard work to create wealth and achievement is considered a myth by liberals created by the rich to keep people from revolting.
Pillar Three: Intention Based Assessment. Liberals, deep in their hearts, know that the policies they advocate are destructive an ineffective. This is why they refuse to argue the merits of them based on actual results. This would destroy them. Rather, they calculate the worth of a policy based on the intended consequence not the actual outcome. This is how glorious failures like the New Deal, Great Society, Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, etc. are all justified and defended. No matter that they have been gross failures, they were intended to help millions of people, therefore they are good. This is also how people like Jimmy Carter stay relevent in liberal circles while JFK's massive supply side tax cut is never mentioned.
Pillar Four: Special Interests. Liberals shrewdly have avoided the label of being in the pocket of special interests while also being completely in the tank for special interests. They do this by re-labeling their special interests as being "of the people". Such as? Big Labor-Labor Unions are supposedly the representative of the working man and liberals say so endlessly. In reality, organized labor makes up less than 20% of the workforce and the Unions themselves act solely as political wings of the Democratic Party. The entire auto bailout was a gift to unions for continued support. Big Education-Teachers Unions and the Department of Education claim to only be interested in providing the best education possible. This is a lie. Both groups are dedicated to obtaining lifetime jobs and pay for their members while creating a monopoly for the public school system. They are viciously against any reforms giving the average person more choices that result in less money for them. Big Media-Despite constant crying about how the media is unfair to liberals, in reality all but talk radio and FOX News are completely in their pocket. They would further eliminate dissent through FCC regulation. Big Environment-The Green movement is a special interest movement worth billions of dollars masquerading as a common good causes. Many green groups even enjoy tax exempt status while flagrantly supporting one political ideology. The green movement is the home of both government funded pseudoscience and displaced Marxists. Big Government-Leftists claim that the government is "our government" and is "for the people". Theoretically true, it says so in our founding documents. But when the government is used as a tool to implement an unconstitutional limitation of basic freedoms, it becomes the largest special interest group in the country and the one liberals are most in the pocket for. The one thing all these liberal special interest groups have in common is that they aim to deprive the average person of freedoms and liberties of choice. They want to force you into their prescribed path.
Pillar Five: Elitism. Liberals think they are better than non-liberals and it can't be argued. They think the general population is too ignorant and misguided to live life for themselves, that's why government must have heavy regulations to keep people in line. That's how a liberal justifies to themselves the incessant tampering in the lives of others, it's for their own good.
SUB Pillar B: Emotion. This permeates all other pillars of liberal belief. That is why debate is so difficult with the Left. When cornered with one hypocritical or contradictory fact, they go to emotion. They will bring up children, the poor, women, racism, bigotry, etc. all in an attempt to create a straw man argument to debate rather than actual issue. This is why there is never any resolution to liberal arguments.
SUB Pillar C: Projectionism. Many of the more unpleasant traits of liberalism, such as racism, classicism or general bigotry, can be seen in the way liberals attack conservatives. They have these traits so close in their own hearts that they assume all others do too. They then label others with them at the drop of a hat. This is useful in trying to determine what liberal are actually thinking.
CONCLUSION: This massive contradiction of thought and belief can make if very hard to deal with these people. All of these factors come and go as needed by the liberal to further their pet cause de jour. What can be gleaned from this? First, liberalism must simply be defeated because it can't be reasoned with. Second, liberalism is an attack on the individual based on fear. Liberal can't handle the responsibility of living in an individual world where they alone would deal with the potential negative consequences of their decisions. That's why they try and group people together into a collectivists commune. Nobody alone can be blamed for a bad decision or suffer it's consequences. It's a cowardly way to hedge your bets against failure. The more people that are involved, the more wide spread the blame, that's why they need to force you into it too.
I'll try and delve further into the liberal mind as inspiration strikes. This is as good a start as any, I suppose.
I am starting to really like full blown, out in the open Communists.
This sounds strange but Marx's army are far less frustrating then your average liberal Statist. At least the Commie has an well thought out manifesto and plan of action, wrong as it is. You can debate and argue with these people because you can argue idea for idea, point by point with some hope of resolution.
Liberals in the United States have no such coherent system of beliefs. They are all over the board, contradicting themselves whenever the need arises. Can their ideology even be measured or classified? We're going to try!
Pillar One: Identity. Identity plays more a role in liberal politics than anything else. Rather than seeing the United States as a county, they see a collection of people defined into various groups of victims and victimizers. They see themselves as champions of the victims. The liberal also believes that people that fall into the victim class cannot help themselves in life. This belief is used to justify the ever intrusive actions of the government and by extension themselves.
SUB Pillar A: Circular Bigotry. Leftists have carved out an amazing niche of racism against everybody. White people (except for enlightened liberals) are by their very nature afraid of and biased against all people of color. All decisions by non liberal whites are viewed from this paradigm and are therefore subject to suspicious interpretation. Minorities are also viewed through the lens of racism. They are seen by the liberal eye as being incapable of fending for themselves in this world. They can only survive with the help of the government when run by enlightened, white liberals. It is a condescending form of racism, viewing entire groups of people as incompetent and helpless. Whenever a minority rises to prominence without liberal help, they are savagely attacked as being Uncle Toms or sellouts of some kind. See Thomas, Clarence. Sowell, Thomas or Estrada, Miguel.
Pillar Two: Class. American leftists have a deep rooted seething hatred of rich people. This is a flagrant contradiction since the liberal ranks hold some of the worlds wealthiest people, a fact often forgot by leftists when raging against big business. This hypocritical belief allows liberal to simultaneously reap the rewards of rich donors while also allowing them to stoke class warfare against other rich people. This is done to solidify a power base. Liberals benefit from class warfare by convincing the larger group of people (not rich) that they are the helpless victims of the smaller group (rich) and that government is the force to relieve them from their imaginary oppression. The American Dream of hard work to create wealth and achievement is considered a myth by liberals created by the rich to keep people from revolting.
Pillar Three: Intention Based Assessment. Liberals, deep in their hearts, know that the policies they advocate are destructive an ineffective. This is why they refuse to argue the merits of them based on actual results. This would destroy them. Rather, they calculate the worth of a policy based on the intended consequence not the actual outcome. This is how glorious failures like the New Deal, Great Society, Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, etc. are all justified and defended. No matter that they have been gross failures, they were intended to help millions of people, therefore they are good. This is also how people like Jimmy Carter stay relevent in liberal circles while JFK's massive supply side tax cut is never mentioned.
Pillar Four: Special Interests. Liberals shrewdly have avoided the label of being in the pocket of special interests while also being completely in the tank for special interests. They do this by re-labeling their special interests as being "of the people". Such as? Big Labor-Labor Unions are supposedly the representative of the working man and liberals say so endlessly. In reality, organized labor makes up less than 20% of the workforce and the Unions themselves act solely as political wings of the Democratic Party. The entire auto bailout was a gift to unions for continued support. Big Education-Teachers Unions and the Department of Education claim to only be interested in providing the best education possible. This is a lie. Both groups are dedicated to obtaining lifetime jobs and pay for their members while creating a monopoly for the public school system. They are viciously against any reforms giving the average person more choices that result in less money for them. Big Media-Despite constant crying about how the media is unfair to liberals, in reality all but talk radio and FOX News are completely in their pocket. They would further eliminate dissent through FCC regulation. Big Environment-The Green movement is a special interest movement worth billions of dollars masquerading as a common good causes. Many green groups even enjoy tax exempt status while flagrantly supporting one political ideology. The green movement is the home of both government funded pseudoscience and displaced Marxists. Big Government-Leftists claim that the government is "our government" and is "for the people". Theoretically true, it says so in our founding documents. But when the government is used as a tool to implement an unconstitutional limitation of basic freedoms, it becomes the largest special interest group in the country and the one liberals are most in the pocket for. The one thing all these liberal special interest groups have in common is that they aim to deprive the average person of freedoms and liberties of choice. They want to force you into their prescribed path.
Pillar Five: Elitism. Liberals think they are better than non-liberals and it can't be argued. They think the general population is too ignorant and misguided to live life for themselves, that's why government must have heavy regulations to keep people in line. That's how a liberal justifies to themselves the incessant tampering in the lives of others, it's for their own good.
SUB Pillar B: Emotion. This permeates all other pillars of liberal belief. That is why debate is so difficult with the Left. When cornered with one hypocritical or contradictory fact, they go to emotion. They will bring up children, the poor, women, racism, bigotry, etc. all in an attempt to create a straw man argument to debate rather than actual issue. This is why there is never any resolution to liberal arguments.
SUB Pillar C: Projectionism. Many of the more unpleasant traits of liberalism, such as racism, classicism or general bigotry, can be seen in the way liberals attack conservatives. They have these traits so close in their own hearts that they assume all others do too. They then label others with them at the drop of a hat. This is useful in trying to determine what liberal are actually thinking.
CONCLUSION: This massive contradiction of thought and belief can make if very hard to deal with these people. All of these factors come and go as needed by the liberal to further their pet cause de jour. What can be gleaned from this? First, liberalism must simply be defeated because it can't be reasoned with. Second, liberalism is an attack on the individual based on fear. Liberal can't handle the responsibility of living in an individual world where they alone would deal with the potential negative consequences of their decisions. That's why they try and group people together into a collectivists commune. Nobody alone can be blamed for a bad decision or suffer it's consequences. It's a cowardly way to hedge your bets against failure. The more people that are involved, the more wide spread the blame, that's why they need to force you into it too.
I'll try and delve further into the liberal mind as inspiration strikes. This is as good a start as any, I suppose.
NFC Preview
NFC EAST: 1) Eagles 2) Giants 3) Cowboys 4) Redskins. The Giants could win the division if they can find another reciever to shot himself in the leg.
NFC NORTH: 1) Packers 2) Vikings 3) Bears 4) Lions. Favre makes a good story but Rodgers makes cheese nation forget all about the Chief Gray Wrangler.
NFC SOUTH: 1)Saints 2) Falcons 3) Tampa Bay 4) Carolina. Saints/Falcons could go either way but we know where Delhomme is going and it aint pretty.
NFC WEST: 1) Seattle 2) Arizona 3) 49ers 4) Rams. I'm betting Leinert has to play for 3 or 4 games this year. Notice they're in second?
DIVISION WINNERS: Eagles, Pack, Saints, Hawks
WILD CARDS: Vikings, Cardinals
NFC CHAMPION: Philadelphia Eagles
SUPER BOWL: Philadelphia Eagles 35 New England Patriots 28.
NFC NORTH: 1) Packers 2) Vikings 3) Bears 4) Lions. Favre makes a good story but Rodgers makes cheese nation forget all about the Chief Gray Wrangler.
NFC SOUTH: 1)Saints 2) Falcons 3) Tampa Bay 4) Carolina. Saints/Falcons could go either way but we know where Delhomme is going and it aint pretty.
NFC WEST: 1) Seattle 2) Arizona 3) 49ers 4) Rams. I'm betting Leinert has to play for 3 or 4 games this year. Notice they're in second?
DIVISION WINNERS: Eagles, Pack, Saints, Hawks
WILD CARDS: Vikings, Cardinals
NFC CHAMPION: Philadelphia Eagles
SUPER BOWL: Philadelphia Eagles 35 New England Patriots 28.
AFC Preview
Well, I guess all 32 teams don't get a preview this year. I'll start on net years preview right after the pro bowl.
AFC EAST: 1) Patriots 2) Jets 3) Dolphins 4) Bills. If Brady stays healthy there is no way they don't win the division. Jets get a one year boost from the Gray Grizzled Warrior leaving the team. The Bills just suck.
AFC NORTH: 1) Baltimore 2) Steelers 3) Bengals 4) Browns. I'm betting Pitt just can't go through the season unscathed. Big Bens fake date rape accusation was a sign of bad karma. The Browns are one big hot mess.
AFC SOUTH: 1) Colts 2) Texans 3) Titans 4) Jaguars. All four of these teams could win the AFC WEST. Colts win in a squeaker, Schaub stays healthy and LenDale White gets back on the Mexican Rocket Juice.
AFC WEST: 1) Chargers 2) Broncos 3) Raiders 4) Chiefs. Even if Norv Turner seriously screws up in San Diego, they still win the division. All the other three are about the same but the Chiefs are a little more dysfunctional than most.
DIVISION WINNERS: Pat, Colts, Ravens, Chargers
WILD CARDS: Steelers, Texans
AFC CHAMPION: New England Patriots.
AFC EAST: 1) Patriots 2) Jets 3) Dolphins 4) Bills. If Brady stays healthy there is no way they don't win the division. Jets get a one year boost from the Gray Grizzled Warrior leaving the team. The Bills just suck.
AFC NORTH: 1) Baltimore 2) Steelers 3) Bengals 4) Browns. I'm betting Pitt just can't go through the season unscathed. Big Bens fake date rape accusation was a sign of bad karma. The Browns are one big hot mess.
AFC SOUTH: 1) Colts 2) Texans 3) Titans 4) Jaguars. All four of these teams could win the AFC WEST. Colts win in a squeaker, Schaub stays healthy and LenDale White gets back on the Mexican Rocket Juice.
AFC WEST: 1) Chargers 2) Broncos 3) Raiders 4) Chiefs. Even if Norv Turner seriously screws up in San Diego, they still win the division. All the other three are about the same but the Chiefs are a little more dysfunctional than most.
DIVISION WINNERS: Pat, Colts, Ravens, Chargers
WILD CARDS: Steelers, Texans
AFC CHAMPION: New England Patriots.
Friday, September 4, 2009
Douche on Douche Crime

Well, it's early September and California is glowing orange from the annual arson fest. While I'm simultaneously annoyed that I can smell the smoke all the way in my pristine mountain community, that incidentally managed not to light itself on fire this year, while also admiring how pretty a roaring fire can be, the spectacle got me thinking about another summer tradition; Burning Man.
You know Burning Man, it's the festival where a bunch of burned out beach bums and an assortment of other young, white, patchouli soaked, yuppie leftists gather to "have an art festival" and practice a egalitarian form of "radical self expression" and "radical self reliance". Almost no money is exchanged, rather "artwork" and "food" are traded, barter style, while some goods and services are traded for "favors". The festival itself is held in a majestic place known as Black Rock City. You may know of it by its other name; Dried-Up Lake Bed in the Middle of Nowhere Nevada. This is apparently somewhere near Reno. The festival ends with the burning of gigantic wooden effigy.
Now, if you are thinking to yourself, all this self aware nonsense sounds like an excuse for a bunch of young leftists to kick off the Dockers and get high, have sex and light stuff on fire, you sir would be correct. This is your typical bonfire festival on acid. Although, radical self expression can really encompass any type of hedonistic or exhibitionist behavior, so I guess it isn't all that misleading. I would argue however, that if they just called it the Free Sex, Drugs and Fire Festival it would get more people to go but that's just one mans opinion.
To even the scales a bit, the Burning Man enclave, try to dedicate themselves to other green causes, such as not leaving anything behind, not destroying nature, etc. etc. Combine that with egalitarianism and this is a left wing paradise, no?
Apparently, not.
Burning Man has a arch-nemesis. Mormons? No. Republicans? No! Deodorant? No!
Cooling Man.
Oh yes, you heard it right, gentle friends. Cooling Man.
Apparently, this group of incense burning, zero growth, Walden II replicants think the patchouli soaked, self expressing exhibitionists aren't paying enough attention to their own role in global warming due to the massive carbon footprint caused by lighting a 90 foot wooden man on fire while living like Gypsies in the burned out wasteland in Nevada.
Just to address it, this beef is ridiculous. Global warming is a myth, disproved many times. So that is strike one. And two. As for the environmental damage, really? Have you seen this place? It's a dry lake in Nevada. Lighting it on fire might at least make some glass in the sand, which is better than the nothing there now.
The real story is how these two groups must fight. It must be a sight to see. A bunch of pacifists sending highly passive aggressive emails approved by Al Gore and vast debates over the value of planting trees in sand and buying carbon offsets. One thing is for sure, nothing gets done before noon.
The only thing that could make watching this snake eat its own tail more enjoyable is if a group of those militant treetop living eco-nutjobs from Berkeley went down to ground zero to bust up some skulls, green style.
I would personally plant a tree to support that effort.

(doesn't a neon Burning Man defeat the purpose?)

(beautiful Black Rock City, egalitarian paradise)

(The loyal but unmotivated opposition.)

(Berkeley tree sitter and obvious ladies man. www.treehugger.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)